Pat Keifert on Missional Church
Posted by Brad BriscoMar 15
Here is an interesting video dialog (produced/edited by Bill Kinnon) between Alan Roxbugh and Pat Keifert. They discuss a wide range of issues, including definitions/descriptions of missional church, common views of the contemporary church, and leadership in missional congregations.
In the discussion on leadership I appreciate Keifert’s emphasis on leadership being more about time than about a position. He speaks about the leader cultivating segments of time to assist the congregation in discerning what God is doing in their local context. It is about taking the time to create environments for people to dwell in the Word. It is about having the time to be patient — to hear from God and to hear from each other.
Another topic that I found interesting dealt with Keifert’s journey towards the missional church conversation. He shares how it involved both “failure” and “discovery.” The failure involved disenchantment with his own ministry experience in a traditional church. The discovery included the reading of Newbigin’s “Foolishness to the Greeks.”
I think Keifert’s journey parallels the experience of many. There is a deep sense of uneasiness, frustration, or even failure in a current ministry setting. Church leaders recognize something isn’t right about how they do ministry. They sense that something has changed, but they are unsure about the essence of the change, or what changes might be necessary. At some point, however, they “discover” that others have experienced the same anxiety. They “discover” authors that begin to give language to these changes. Perhaps, like Keifert its Newbigin, or Bosch; or more recently, maybe it is Guder, Van Gelder, Hirsch, or Frost. But regardless of the author, they rediscover the missionary nature of God and His church, and the reality that the church is sent into the mission field that is now North America.
This has certainly been my journey. I wonder about your experience. Has failure + discovery propelled you into the missional conversation?
2 comments
Comment by Will on March 17, 2010 at 6:43 am
I’m one of those who has become disenchanted with ministry in the traditional church (UMC). We measure all the wrong things. Those who don’t grow the attendance in worship are thought of, at best, as less effective than others. The most important thing is the payment of ministry shares. Leadership would deny this, but it is that which gets the most attention. It is the goal every church is expected to meet. We are not expected to reach a goal of commitments to Christ or starting of new ministries in the community. And the numbers of members and worship attendance continues to decline. No change in site.
Comment by Brad Brisco on March 17, 2010 at 8:46 am
Will, I know your words resonate with many. Have you read McNeal’s “Missional Renaissance”? Would any of the leadership be open to reading it? It speaks really well to the issue of measurables or scorecards. It also gives good advice for making incremental changes in a missional direction, that I believe are very doable for traditional churches. If that doesn’t work, go plant a church