Missional: More Than a Buzz Word
June 23, 2008 | Filed Under missional |
Missional: More Than a Buzz Word
(The Sequel)
In an earlier post I shared three theological distinctions that I believe are necessary to bring clarity and explanation to the use of the word “missional.” Today I want to move the discussion toward practical issues in congregational life.
However, before considering steps that may be taken to help move a church in a missional direction it is necessary that we challenge our basic theological assumptions about who we are as faith communities in God’s Kingdom. Without such theological considerations we run the risk of simply attaching the word “missional” onto everything the church is already doing rather than gaining a fresh perspective to see more clearly what the missional church is all about.
Therefore, I want to begin by elaborating on the three theological distinctions discussed earlier and then add five practical reflections on how to best foster a missional posture within a new or existing faith community.
1. The Missional Church is about the missionary nature of God and His church.
The church is a vital part of the missional conversation. However, the church must not be seen as “a place where religious goods and services are provided,” but instead it should be understood as the “gathered and sent people of God.”
Scripture is replete with language that speaks to the missionary nature of a Triune God. God the Father sends the Son, and God the Father and the Son sends the Spirit, and God the Father and the Son and the Spirit sends the church. In the Gospel of John alone, Jesus describes Himself more than thirty times as “one sent.” In the final climatic sending passage in John’s Gospel, Jesus sees himself not only as one sent but also as one who is sending: “As the Father has sent me, I am sending you” (John 20:21).
The Missional Church recognizes the purpose of the church is derived from the very nature of God which in turn compels it to be sent as a missionary people, individually and collectively.
2. The Missional Church is about the church being incarnational rather than attractional.
Those with a missional perspective no longer see the church service as the primary connecting point for those outside the church. The missional church is more concerned about sending the people in the church out among the people of the world, rather than getting the people of the world in among the people of the church. Others have described this distinction as a challenge to “go and be” as opposed to “come and see.”
Missional churches see their primary function as one of actively moving into a community to embody and enflesh the word, deed and life of Jesus into every nook and cranny. Eugene Peterson’s “incarnational” rendering of John 1:14 in the Message paraphrase illustrates this well when it states, “The Word became flesh and blood and moved into the neighborhood.”
3. The Missional Church is about actively participating in the missio Dei, or mission of God.
Many times we wrongly assume that the primary activity of God is in the church, rather than recognizing that God’s primary activity is in the world, and the church is God’s instrument sent into the world to participate in His redemptive mission.
This distinction clarifies the difference between a church with a missions program and a missional church. A church with a missions program usually sees missions as one activity alongside many other equally important programs of the church. A missional church, on the other hand, focuses all of its activities around its participation in God’s agenda for the world.
As the sent, missionary people of God, the missional church understands its fundamental purpose as being rooted in God’s mission to restore and heal creation and to call people into a reconciled relationship with Himself. It is God’s mission, or missio Dei, that calls the church into existence. Or in the words of South African missiologist David Bosch; “It is not the church which undertakes mission; it is the missio Dei which constitutes the church.”
Fostering a Missional Posture
So what will it take for the church to foster a missional posture? We must first begin with deep reflections and dialogue surrounding the three theological distinctions mentioned above. Beyond these three points there are at least five practical, yet no less important considerations.
1. Start with Spiritual Formation
As mentioned above, God calls the church to be a sent community of people who no longer live for themselves but instead live to participate with Him in His redemptive purposes. However, people will have neither the passion nor the strength to live as a counter cultural society for the sake of others if they are not transformed by the way of Jesus. If the church is to “go and be” then we must make certain that we are a Spirit formed community that has the spiritual capacity to impact the lives of others.
This means the church must take seriously its responsibility to cultivate spiritual transformation that does not allow believers to remain as adolescents in their spiritual maturity. Such spiritual formation will involve much greater relational underpinnings and considerable engagement with a multitude of spiritual disciplines.
2. Emphasize the Priesthood of All Believers
Martin Luther’s idea of the priesthood of all believers was that all Christians were called to carry out their vocational ministries in every area of life. Every believer must fully understand how their vocation plays a central part in God’s redemptive Kingdom.
I think it was Rick Warren who made popular the phase “every member is a minister.” While this phrase is a helpful slogan to move people to understand their responsibility in the life of the church, God’s purpose for His church would be better served if we encouraged people to recognize that “every member is a missionary.”
3. Create a New Scorecard
The church must move far beyond measuring success by the traditional indicators of attendance, buildings and cash. Instead we must create new scorecards to measure ministry effectiveness. These new scorecards will include measurements that point to the church’s impact on community transformation rather than measuring what is happening among church members inside the church walls.
A missional church may ask how many hours has the church spent praying for community issues? How many hours have church members (including staff) spent with unbelievers? How many community groups use the facilities of the church? How many people are healthier because of the clinic the church operates? How many people are in new jobs because of free job training offered by the church? What is the number of school children who are getting better grades because of after-school tutoring the church provides. Or how many times do community leaders call the church asking for advice?
Until the church reconsiders the definition of ministry success and creates new scorecards to appropriately measure that success, we will continue to allocate vital resources in misguided directions.
4. Search for Third Places
In a post-Christendom culture where more and more people are less and less interested in activities of the church, it is increasingly important to connect with people in places of neutrality, or common “hang outs.” In the book “The Great Good Place” author Ray Oldenburg identifies these places of common ground as “third places.”
According to Oldenburg, third places are those environments in which people meet to interact with others and develop friendships. In Oldenburg’s thinking our first place is the home and the people with whom we live. The second place is where we work and the place we spend the majority of our waking hours. But the third place is an informal setting where people relax and have the opportunity to know and be known by others.
Third places might include the local coffee shop, hair salon, restaurant, mall, or fitness center. These places of common ground must take a position of greater importance in the overall ministry of the church as individuals begin to recognize themselves as missionaries sent into the local context to serve.
In addition to connecting with people in the third places present in our local communities, we need to rediscover the topic of hospitality whereby our own homes become a place of common ground. Biblical hospitality is much more than entertaining others in our homes. Genuine hospitality involves inviting people into our lives, learning to listen, and cultivating an environment of mercy and justice, whether our interactions occur in third places or within our own homes. Regardless of our setting, we must learn to welcome the stranger.
5. Tap into the Power of Stories
Instead of trying to define what it means to be missional, it may be helpful to describe missional living through stories and images. We can capture the “missional imagination” by sharing what other faith communities are doing and illustrate what it looks like to connect with people in third places, cultivate rapport with local schools, and build relationships with neighbors.
Moreover, we can reflect deeply on biblical images of mission, service and hospitality by spending time on passages such as Genesis 12:2, Isaiah 61:1-3, Matthew 5:43; 10:40; 22:39; 25:35 and Luke 10:25-37.
The greatest challenge facing the church in the West is the “re-conversion” of its own members. We need to be converted away from an internally focused, Constantinean mode of church and converted towards an externally focused, missional-incarnational movement that is a true reflection of the missionary God we follow. This conversion will not be easy. The gravitational pull to focus all of our resources on ourselves is strong. My prayer, however, is that a clearer understanding of the word “missional” will help to form us and ultimately move us in the proper direction.
To read what others are saying about the word missional, check out the following links:
Alan Hirsch, Alan Knox, Andrew Jones, Barb Peters, Bill Kinnon, Brad Grinnen, Brad Sargent, Brother Maynard, Bryan Riley, Chad Brooks, Chris Wignall, Cobus Van Wyngaard, Dave DeVries, David Best, David Fitch, David Wierzbicki, DoSi, Doug Jones, Duncan McFadzean, Erika Haub, Grace, Jamie Arpin-Ricci, Jeff McQuilkin, John Smulo, Jonathan Brink, JR Rozko, Kathy Escobar, Len Hjalmarson, Makeesha Fisher, Malcolm Lanham, Mark Berry, Mark Petersen, Mark Priddy, Michael Crane, Michael Stewart, Nick Loyd, Patrick Oden, Peggy Brown, Phil Wyman, Richard Pool, Rick Meigs, Rob Robinson, Ron Cole, Scott Marshall, Sonja Andrews, Stephen Shields, Steve Hayes, Tim Thompson, Thom Turner
Leave a Comment
If you would like to make a comment, please fill out the form below.
Categories
- alan hirsch
- alan roxburgh
- blogging
- books
- church
- church planting
- culture
- dmin project
- donald miller
- ecclesiology
- georges boujakly
- gospel
- henri nouwen
- hospitality
- incarnational
- justice
- kingdom of God
- leadership
- lesslie newbigin
- meanderings
- missiology
- missional
- music
- networks
- new monasticism
- prayer
- scripture
- spiritual formation
- spiritual friendship
- theology
- way of Jesus
- missional images
- meeting neighbors
- henri nouwen
- the system is flawed
- the system is flawed 2
- crusades & the KOG
- God's heart & the poor
- starfish & the church
- U2 - where the streets
Favorite Posts
Archives
Blogroll
- alan hirsch
- andrew jones
- backyard missionary
- bill kinnon
- bittersweetlife
- blind beggar
- bob hyatt
- bob roberts
- brad andrews
- david fitch
- divine hours
- drew goodmanson
- ed stetzer
- imonk
- jeremy bouma
- jeremy pryor
- jesus community
- jesus creed
- jesus manifesto
- john smulo
- jonathan brink
- jonathan dodson
- jordon cooper
- jr woodward
- kingdom grace
- kruse kronicle
- matt smay
- matt stone
- missio dei breviary
- missional challenge
- missional order
- missional students
- next reformation
- nt wright page
- paul hill
- pomomusings
- rustin smith
- shapevine
- simple church
- suburban christian
- subversive influence
- swinging from the vine
- the daily office
- tim keel
- todd hiestand
- tony stiff
- w. david phillips
- what’s your point caller
- will samson



Great Post! Very helpful in this current conversation about what a Missional Church is.
[...] Hirsch Alan Knox Andrew Jones Arnau van Wyngaard Barb Peters Bill Kinnon Brad Brisco Brad Grinnen Brad Sargent Brother Maynard Bryan Riley Chad Brooks Chris Wignall Cobus Van Wyngaard [...]
[...] Hirsch Alan Knox Andrew Jones Barb Peters Bill Kinnon Brad Brisco Brad Grinnen Brad Sargent Brother Maynard Bryan Riley Chad Brooks Chris Wignall Cobus Van Wyngaard [...]
[...] Hirsch Alan Knox Andrew Jones Barb Peters Bill Kinnon Brad Brisco Brad Grinnen Brad Sargent Brother Maynard Bryan Riley Chad Brooks Chris Wignall Cobus Van Wyngaard [...]
[...] Brad Briscoe on missional ministry. Read it. [...]
Very, very nice post, Brad. You sum up quite succinctly not only the meaning but also the underlying attitudes and outward responses.
The new scorecards concept at first bothers me a bit, but I realize how much this is likely very much needed. Especially in a transition era from one church reality to a next and for many people who need to have something to hang their hat on at the end of the day. You came up with a great model for that, emphasizing what we see in Acts rather than what we see in sales techniques. And with that I think is your last point. We need the stories, and we need the stories of our own lives and the stories of our history.
We really also need to reshape our use of the Bible away from scattered verses to justify our theology. I think that the Bible has been co-opted as source material for non-Biblical patterns. We need to use not only the content but also the conduct of the New Testament in pursuing the mission of God.
May the re-conversion continue!
[...] at Missional Church Network Brad Brisco has a great post highlighting what it means practically to be a “missional [...]
[...] Missional: More Than a Buzz Word « Missional Church Network In an earlier post I shared three theological distinctions that I believe are necessary to bring clarity and explanation to the use of the word “missional.” Today I want to move the discussion toward practical issues in congregational life. (tags: missional church attractional) [...]
brad,
great piece. i first started thinking of the new scorecard after hearing reggie mcneal call for the same change.
i particularly enjoy your suggestions for ‘fostering a missional posture’. it seems to give all a chance to participate.
peace,
brad
Brad, I have so enjoyed reading your thoughts here on ” missional.” I’m meeting with a group of church leaders later in the week, I hope you don’t mind me sharing your post…it should engage us to really re-evaluate what we are. Peace…Ron Cole+
Martin - Thanks for the kind words and glad it was helpful.
Patrick - Thanks for the comments. I agree that the “scorecard” idea is a tough one, especially for existing churches. We simplly haven’t thought that way in the past.
Brad - I too first heard “scorecard” from McNeal most likely from “Present Future.” I really think this is a vital part of getting churches to reallocate resources in missional directions.
Ron - Thanks for the comments and of course I would be honored to have you share the piece with others. Hope it will play a small part in challenging your leadership.
[...] Brad Brisco titled his post “Missional: More Than a Buzz Word,” which seems to express a widely-agreed sentiment. He structured a threefold description by saying that missional church is “about the missionary nature of God and His church”; “incarnational rather than attractional”; and it’s “about actively participating in the missio Dei, or mission of God.” These three themes will be familiar to anyone who is actually paying attention to the term and how it’s being defined by some of the leaders in the conversation. To foster a missional posture, he says, begin with Spiritual Formation, emphasize the Priesthood of All Believers, create new ways of measuring ministry success, search for “Third Places,” and tap into the power of stories. [...]
Brad, I really enjoyed your post and just found myself agreeing all the way through. As I read the synchroblog posts I’m finding a lot of consistency, but also a cynicism remainins from some who don’t attribute much meaning to the word. As ever, the challenge will come in actually living it out, that’s where the proof is. The answer to the synchroblog is to tell the story of our life in a year time and see if it actually does live out what we wrote. Thanks for your thoughts.
I found this post extremely helpful. Just a couple of comments:
On missio dei: does a “reconciled relationship” go far enough? I often describe it in terms of being conformed to the image of Christ, which begins with reconciliation but goes beyond that. Do you agree?
On Spiritual Formation: I think you are absolutely right that this is the place to begin. Existing churches need this badly, which is an emphasis of both of our DMin research. It seems that older churches like mine value what is said from the pulpit, so forming the community missionally begins there in our context. I’m finding that they respond when they view the Bible missionally.
On scorecards: Earl Creps has written a book called Off-Road Disciplines that has excellent suggestions for a new scorecard. They are similar to McNeal but go beyond him.
Brian thanks for the great comments.
First, its funny I have the Crep’s book but have never gotten to it, but most certainly will.
In regards to your other two comments, I couldn’t agree more. I hope very soon to share a new endeavor that I and two of my best friends have been working on for a year now. It is a “missional order” that is organized around the three key “common commitments” of sacred rhythm, continuous formation, and participation in the missio Dei.
Instead of it being a monastic/cloister type of order, where people move/live together as a community, (which btw I would want to affirm and enthusiastically commend) this order that we are working on is a dispersed, web-based “community” that we hope will help to foster spiritual formation that will eventually lead to the encouragement/support of missional communities.
Wow, I didn’t plan on saying so much at this time but I am very excited about the possibilities. Hope to share more very soon and thanks again for the great reflections.
[...] We need to be converted away from an internally focused, Constantinean mode of church and converted towards an externally focused, missional-incarnational movement that is a true reflection of the missionary God we follow. -Brad Brisco [...]
[...] response to last week’s synchronized blog dealing with the word “missional” I wrote a post in which I tried to deal with both the theological distinctions that I believe should be discussed [...]
[...] for worship and spiritual nourishment. This is one of the reasons I stated in my article on Missional: More Than a Buzz Word that we must begin with spiritual [...]
this rocks!!!